EU Court Rules Non-Alcoholic Drinks Cannot Be Called ‘Gin’

The European Court of Justice (ECJ) has issued a landmark ruling that non-alcoholic beverages cannot use the term “gin” on their labels, even when accompanied by qualifiers such as “non-alcoholic” or “virgin”.

This decision on non-alcoholic gin naming rules reinforces strict EU regulations governing the naming of spirit drinks. It aims to prevent consumer confusion and protect the integrity of traditional gin producers.

ECJ Case Study: Verband Sozialer Wettbewerb v PB Vi Goods

The case originated in Germany, where the consumer watchdog Verband Sozialer Wettbewerb challenged PB Vi Goods, a company marketing a product called Virgin Gin Alkoholfrei.

Regulators argued that this name violated EU spirit drink regulations by using a protected designation for a product that did not meet the legal definition of gin in that it was not alcoholic.

What EU Law Says About the Term “Gin”

Under EU Regulation 2019/787, “gin” is a protected designation reserved for spirit drinks that are:

• Made by flavouring ethyl alcohol of agricultural origin with juniper berries
• Containing a minimum alcohol strength of 37.5% by volume.

The court ruled that these criteria are non-negotiable, and any beverage failing to meet them cannot be marketed as gin. Importantly, the judges stated that adding descriptors like “non-alcoholic” does not alter the prohibition, as the essence of the term is tied to its alcoholic content.

Impact on the Low- and No-Alcohol Market

The ruling comes amid rapid growth in the low- and no-alcohol sector, which reached an estimated global value of $20 billion in 2024. Industry experts predict the decision will have significant implications for branding strategies in the zero-alcohol market.

Producers may need to adopt terms like “gin alternative”, “botanical spirit” or even “juniper-led character” to comply with EU law.

Trade Mark Implications: Regulatory Definitions Supersede Branding Strategy

The ruling has significant consequences for trade marks and brand strategy within the EU. At its core, the ruling reinforces the principle that protected designations and product categories under EU regulations override trade mark rights when there is a risk of consumer deception.

This means that even if a company registers a trade mark such as Virgin Gin or Zero Gin, that mark cannot be lawfully used on products that do not meet the regulatory definition.

For trade mark owners, this underscores the importance of clear differentiation: using alternative descriptors such as “botanical spirit” or “gin-style” may reduce legal risk, though even these could face scrutiny if they imply equivalence to gin.

From an enforcement perspective, the ruling strengthens the position of traditional gin producers and industry associations, who can challenge infringing marks or marketing under both regulatory law and trade mark law. It also signals that the EU prioritizes consumer clarity over brand creativity, a principle that trade mark practitioners must factor into clearance searches and brand development strategies.

Key Takeaways for UK Businesses and How to Act

For businesses, the takeaway is clear: trade mark rights cannot override product definitions in regulated sectors. Before investing in branding, companies should conduct not only trade mark searches but also regulatory compliance checks to avoid costly disputes and rebranding.

This ruling only applies to the EU but any UK businesses looking to export their products to the EU must comply with this ruling when doing so. This could lead to expensive rebranding and repackaging exercises and UK businesses may be wise to comply with this ruling in order to avoid that disruption.

Seeking Support with Trade Marks and Compliance Checks

Napthens’ dedicated Intellectual Property team is on hand to support clients from formulation of idea all the way through to monitoring and litigious enforcement.

To start your journey on registering a trade mark, visit our trade mark registration page or contact us today via our form.